Comments on: Was Copernicus wrong?

By: Nathalie

Nathalie — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:01:08 +0000

I reread the comment and ? think what’s missing here is the clear definition of subjectivity and the difference between resolving life issues by experiencing with your soul and intuition or by judgement like you said. One can only calculate what life would be like by judgement, but when you actually live, you know by seeing with your bare eyes. One can only tell a blind man how the trees look like but he will never know.

By: Sadok

Sadok — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:06:06 +0000

Responsibility means accountable or answerable deriving from the word “responsus” (answer). One can only be accountable or can only answer for its own actions. Trying to answer for other people’s choices requires judgment and judgment by definition relies on subjective experiences of life.

‘Tis with our judgments as our watches, none Go just alike, yet each believes his own. – Alexander Pope

You cannot “be for” anything or anybody but yourself. “Being for” is self gratifying only if it is purely an inner choice, no recognition needed but your own.

Being the center of the universe does not mean to be apart or above it, means being it, means recognizing that all is you and all is one. Its there only for you to experience this holy unison.

There are no demons, only angels, there are no mistakes, only lessons…

By: Paolo

Paolo — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:57:48 +0000

Sorry man, but I have to totally disagree here. What you suggest is the very basis of our “liquid society”, which cannot bring any real happiness to anyone. Instead, I think we should put at the core of our lives the concept of “responsibility” and “being for”. Nietzsche’s superhuman is the last ideology which needs to be defeated.

By: Nathalie

Nathalie — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:12:56 +0000

I WISH MANY MANY MANY MORE PEOPLE REACH THIS WRITING AND THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE WRITING.
I WISH PEOPLE COULD STOP PRETENDING.
I WISH TO KNOW MORE PEOPLE LIKE YOU.
REAL.